diff --git a/src/base128.c b/src/base128.c index 12bc19f..6b1016b 100644 --- a/src/base128.c +++ b/src/base128.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ inline static void base128_reverse_init(void) unsigned char c; if (!reverse_init) { - memset (rev128, 0, 256); + memset(rev128, 0, 256); for (i = 0; i < 128; i++) { c = cb128[i]; rev128[(int) c] = i; @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static int base128_decode(void *buf, size_t *buflen, const char *str, int iout = 0; /* to-be-filled output byte */ int iin = 0; /* next input char to use in decoding */ - base128_reverse_init (); + base128_reverse_init(); /* Note: Don't bother to optimize manually. GCC optimizes better(!) when using simplistic array indexing. */ diff --git a/src/base32.c b/src/base32.c index cb68193..af4596c 100644 --- a/src/base32.c +++ b/src/base32.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ inline static void base32_reverse_init(void) unsigned char c; if (!reverse_init) { - memset (rev32, 0, 256); + memset(rev32, 0, 256); for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { c = cb32[i]; rev32[(int) c] = i; @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int base32_decode(void *buf, size_t *buflen, const char *str, int iout = 0; /* to-be-filled output byte */ int iin = 0; /* next input char to use in decoding */ - base32_reverse_init (); + base32_reverse_init(); /* Note: Don't bother to optimize manually. GCC optimizes better(!) when using simplistic array indexing. */ diff --git a/src/base64.c b/src/base64.c index abf548d..2a80abe 100644 --- a/src/base64.c +++ b/src/base64.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ inline static void base64_reverse_init(void) unsigned char c; if (!reverse_init) { - memset (rev64, 0, 256); + memset(rev64, 0, 256); for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) { c = cb64[i]; rev64[(int) c] = i; @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static int base64_decode(void *buf, size_t *buflen, const char *str, int iout = 0; /* to-be-filled output byte */ int iin = 0; /* next input char to use in decoding */ - base64_reverse_init (); + base64_reverse_init(); /* Note: Don't bother to optimize manually. GCC optimizes better(!) when using simplistic array indexing. */